Showing posts with label monthly numbers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label monthly numbers. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Is the beginning of the second leg down in prices?

Residential Sales plummeted across the board in Edmonton and Calgary last month. The first drop in prices last summer was preceded by a sharp contraction in sales volumes from the bubble level sales.

While condos in both Edmonton and Calgary saw a sharp drop in prices, an across the board massive drop in value hasn’t occurred yet. Like a ten per cent fall in SFH values in Calgary or Edmonton in a month.


With the psychologically important oil prices below $50 and environmental pressures mounting in the face of an ultra liberal government, oil sands might not be the saviour of Alberta Real Estate after all.

If sales fall further in December from the levels seen last year, it’s possible that we are now going to see the second leg down for the real estate prices. And if the macro economic picture and commodity bust unfolds as I’m afraid it might, the spring bounce that so many sellers and realtors are counting on (yet again) will be more ephemeral than a mayfly.

Monday, November 3, 2008

No Subprime in Canada yet Sales Plummet in Calgary

I've been very busy last week or so....this post from 'rjt' puts things into clear perspective:

If you read my posts over the past couple of months, I predicted that the end of 40 year mortgages and zero down mortgages would create a major gap in buyers. I figured that since 40% of mortgages originated in Calgary in 2007 were the 0-down, 40 year variety, when these went a way, sales would drop substantially.

Well, the numbers are out, and while there are other factors in play, it appears that sales volume did fall off a cliff in Oct 2008.

Sales Volume (old criteria of combined SFH and Condo, from BT’s site)

Oct 2001: 1821
Oct 2002: 1930
Oct 2003: 2021
Oct 2004: 2135
Oct 2005: 2584
Oct 2006: 2122
Oct 2007: 1944
Oct 2008: 1442

How about days inventory?
- This is calculated based on month end inventory from BTs site, divided by monthly sales, multiplied by 30

Oct 2001: 101
Oct 2002: 95
Oct 2003: 121
Oct 2004: 100
Oct 2005: 46
Oct 2006: 96
Oct 2007: 154
Oct 2008: 226

Look at Days Inventory over this year. Impressive October!

Oct-07: 154
Nov-07: 148
Dec-07: 148
Jan-08: 134
Feb-08: 131
Mar-08: 148
Apr-08: 162
May-08: 171
Jun-08: 159
Jul-08: 160
Aug-08: 167
Sep-08: 161
Oct-08: 226

A huge number in October 2008, way above anything we’ve seen in Calgary since at least Jan 1999, which is where my data set begins. The second closest month had days inventory of 171 (May 2008).

People, disregard the spin from the media about a “balanced market” and “normalization” and all those other bullsh-t sales pitches. If you are in the market for a house, make sure to low-ball big time, as you are likely the only potential buyer by a mile.

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Okay, the market kind of sucks, but how about some spin!

If you enjoy the headlines at the realtor sites, you'll probably not like the one I've used.
But I guess when your bread and butter depends on making an earnings by selling homes, you've got to master the art of seeing the positive in the sea of negative news.

So what if we have inventory that's close to all time high and it's only the end of April.
So what if have sales that are amongst the lowest in the last several years.
So what if we have the key benchmark price used by EREB and CREB down noticeably since last year.
So what if at the peak of buying season we have got dismal sales to new listings ratio.
....
We will still hold on to our fantastic interpretations of data. Because it suits us.
We cannot possibly go on and say with a straight to all the people who bought at the peak last year that real estate always goes up.
We made big suckers out of all of you (and ourselves included, after all we strongly believe in consuming "our own dog food") and it was great while it lasted.
We don't really know what's going to happen and we are running quite scared.

Saturday, February 2, 2008

January Numbers and other thoughts

We are experiencing the best of the times in this province. Looking around, there are signs of prosperity. Everybody is happily employed or has the best shot they ever had at getting some jobs. Some people have high paying jobs. Lending is still pretty lax and people are still getting their HELOCs based on elevated values of their ‘residential portfolios.’

Yet, the houses are not selling at the pace witnessed in 2005, 2006 or 2007. The sales to listings ratio is close to the lowest levels in many years in both Calgary and Edmonton.

Perhaps, we are slightly past the best of the times in this province.

While the media and the usual suspects are trying desperately to make a trend of an almost statistical aberration in the change in median prices (average isn't the favorite of creb itself), the reality is that if you are a home owner trying to sell your property, you have to wait for a long time to sell your property, if you are able to sell it.

There’s nothing unexpected here.

I won’t spend too much time dissecting the numbers here because it has already been done and also because it’s easy to paint the numbers as ‘half full’ or 'half empty', based on your market perspective. There's nothing conclusive yet that the bubble is deflating.

However, as honest 'students' of markets and not paid shills or 'professional' salespeople , we can look at trends and try to draw some conclusions from them.

The most important trend that hasn’t changed at all is that of continuously rising inventory and falling sales.

As per old criteria, Calgary had only 3500 or so properties for sale in January 2007 and there were over 2631 sales. A hot market.

This year, at month end, Calgary had over 8093 properties and only 1800 sales. That's almost 4.5 months of inventory and it's only January. This is without counting properties on WeList or other FSBO channels.

The price movements do not adequately reflect what the sellers are experiencing as expressed in the days of market statistic.

One of the most unusual things about the Alberta bubble has been the rapidity with which the prices rose and then the abruptness with which the prices began to fall. Even in the worst bubble markets in the US, prices did not double in less than two years. So Alberta is indeed very different from almost any other market, with the exception of perhaps Saskatoon (where Alberta equity locusts went to buy the cheap houses), that we saw price declines on the first sign of major inventory build up. The typical behavior has been inventory build up accompanied by slowing sales ultimately leading to price declines.

But the peak we reached in Alberta was so precipitous that the early declines occurred with severe rapidity, not unlike the fall of NASDAQ from its peak reached in spring of 2000. By early autumn 2000, NASDAQ had almost recovered to over 80 per cent of its peak.

The important questions are- How will things proceed from here?

Alberta market can play out in two different ways. First one, if there’s an 'oil sands shock.' And by that, I mean the sole economic engine powering Alberta’s growth-the oil sands-is adversely impacted by some event. I’m fully aware of the overall lack of correlation between oil prices and real estate, but Alberta which used to be 1 trick pony (Energy sector comprising oil and natural gas) has now become only a half trick pony (oil sands). May be some day natural gas prices will rise and we’ll have a full trick pony again, but we don’t know when that is going to happen. There isn’t much to speak of in terms of diversification of Alberta’s economy and even though energy sector contributes around 30 per cent to our provincial GDP, it is the sector from which every other sector drives its growth. Even the ‘technology companies’ based in Alberta are based on oil and gas sector! No wonder then, if energy sector goes down, Alberta goes bust. The 'shock event' could be of environmental, economic or political nature. If that happens, things will become pretty bad and we’ll probably have to look back at the Alberta of early 80s or the Detroit of today to see how an area that’s dependent on a half trick pony fares when that pony falls ill. Let’s hope and pray that nothing of this sort happens for it will be immensely painful for everyone around. We haven’t diversified a single bit and the unplanned growth only goes on to kill the feeble attempts made at diversification when the energy sector is roaring.

The second scenario, the more likely one, is that there’s no major ‘oil sands shock’ and things just begin to implode-like we have been witnessing since last summer. As mentioned earlier, we still have the best of the times in the province, yet people are not lining up to buy homes. Last year, when the prices were this high, there were multiple bids and the ‘investors’ just couldn’t get enough of Alberta’s real estate. Prices are roughly at the same level that we saw in early 2007 and yet there’s no frenzy to buy. The factors fundamental to Alberta’s real estate are at work. It’s still a lot cheaper to rent a place than to buy it. A house selling for over $400k is easily available on rent for around $1600 to $1800.

We have been looking at renting a bigger place for ourselves and the last few days we have been checking out places for rent. We have been to over a dozen places and every single house was bought either as an investment property or as a consequence of an upgrade. It’s anecdotal, but it clearly indicates a lot of speculative activity and multiple ownership. Speculation that was (and still is in some places) a global phenomenon. In places as far away as Southern tip of New Zealand, to the bustling cities of china, suburbs of Indian metros, resorts and villas in Spain, flats in the UK, condos in Miami, houses in Phoenix and closer home in Vancouver, Victoria and Saskatoon, it has been the same story. Funded by lax lending standards, abetted by the almost non-existent checks and balances in the financial systems, fueled by the ‘getting something for nothing’ mentality of the crowds and the greed of almost everyone involved in the real estate value chain, we saw a massive real estate bubble globally. Yet, every place has its story to cover up the sordid tale of speculative mania. So you don’t need oil sands or anything else to be a part of this frenzy.

What we saw in Alberta, more so than in any other place was a massive ‘hoarding’ of residential product. Hoarding that deprived families a chance of owning a home and improving their quality of life. Hoarding that will prevent stronger migration to this province. Hoarding that prevents a genuine diversification of the province’s economy and ultimately leads to a less than stellar future and extreme dependence on a single industry.

The number of properties under construction is still close to an all time high and they are still building more. The rental market is also getting pretty competitive but there’s no fear or desperation yet. People still have jobs so properties are still getting rented out, even at a monthly loss.

So, is it possible that a spring rebound can occur? Weirder things have happened. Nobody can figure the mysteries of Mr. Market. But based on the inventory levels, falling sales pattern, the extent of speculative activity and the ongoing credit cycle contraction, it doesn’t look likely.

Once again, this is not meant to be a prediction. Make your decisions based on your critical abilities and knowing fully well that you are making a 25/30/40 year commitment to live in frozen tundra (sorry couldn’t resist this after the weather of last 10 days). If you are professionals not dependent on the energy sector, there are better and warmer options out there!

I’m busier than usual and if anyone (bull or bear) would like to write a guest post, please feel free to drop a line to me at albertabubble@gmail.com.

Finally, a request to everyone to keep the tone civil and arguments logical. Remember, this is a forum to give bulls and bears 'equal opportunity' to make their case and present their side of the story without making any personal insults or ad hominem attacks. It will give the readers a good chance to make decisions without having to scroll through scores of meaningless diatribes and flame wars.

Thursday, July 5, 2007

Calgary Numbers....

aren't much different from those of Edmonton. The important number to show decline is the Median Sales price that fell below the April 2007 levels to 388,000.
The total inventory is now up to 8087 a huge increase from last year.
Of course, if we add the Welist numbers, the inventory will be up to around 10,000.
That's roughly 1 property for sale for every hundred residents in Calgary. Will it go as high in Arizona, where the numbers are like 1 property for every 40 or so residents.
Let's see.

On a different note, I find it interesting that people suddenly almost demand empathy for those doing a distress sale (go to comments). Fair enough. But why should there be a problem with those offering lowball offers? The 'low ballers' are just the equivalent of 'flippers' in a falling market. More like 'vulture capitalists'. Bulls, bears, flippers, knife catchers, value seekers all have a function in a free economy and they should be respected for that.

Record High Inventory in Edmonton

First the big one, not a surprise.
The residential inventory at the end of June 2007 was a whopping 6367. This is higher than inventory in any other month since January 2004 and pretty close to the all time high in June 1994. But considering the inventory on COMFREE which probably wasn't around then (or didn't have as many listings), Edmonton inventory is the highest ever on record.

One important consideration should be the growth of Comfree in Edmonton during last two years. Comfree now has over 2000 listings, or close to 1/3 of the MLS listings. MLS's share has been falling, which means the growth in MLS inventory is even more staggering.
Based on about 2000 listings in Comfree, there were 8367 properties for sale in Edmonton.

The average price has fallen and is almost back to where it was in April. The average is now 348, 056, down from 354, 410 in May. Of course, the YOY number will still be a huge increase.

The sales to listings have fallen to almost the buyer's market level of 44%.

What will July bring? I expect more inventory and fewer sales.

Sunday, June 3, 2007

Inventory Rising....and desperation begining

What do you make out of a Realtor press release that begins like this:
"Pessimistic market watchers are peering into the future for any sign of a market slowdown in Edmonton. According to the REALTORS® Association of Edmonton the market remains buoyant with a billion dollars worth of residential sales in May."

So is this the denial stage. Already? And going by the tenor of comments and the ad hominem attacks, it is looking like that. But I'll try to be very rational here. And look at the numbers and fundamentals. And may be an occasional shot at humor.

Let's look at the numbers. First Edmonton.
Inventory seems to have increased quite a bit. We are now close to 5000 on MLS alone. The Sales to listings has fallen to 59%. And the rule of thumb is that anywhere between in 40 to 60% is now a neutral market.
On comfree, there are over 1600 properties listed. And it looks like things are not moving at all in the comfree world.
Just to put things into perspective, last May there were only 1847 properties listed on MLS while comfree had 774.

Now to Calgary. There was quite a bit of stuff added onto the market last month. There are now around 6400 properties on sale on MLS alone. Add around 2000 from comfree and WeList and we have some choice. The Sales were actually down by 2% from last May. The sales to listings ratio is now below 60%, making Calgary a neutral buyer.
So are we at an inflexion point? May be. But you can never underestimate the 'buying power' of masses in a mania.
I'll further crunch these numbers in coming days.

p.s. Texas population increased by 12.7% between 2000 and 2006.
Alberta population increased by 10.6% between 2001 and 2006.
So you see, Texas should have seen even bigger boom than Alberta. Yeah, it's another failed attempt at humor from my side.

Update: As usual, the MSM cheerleaders are out in full swing. Obviously, they will be the last ones to see the import of rise in inventory and how things are sitting for much longer. I wonder why does anyone complain about the existence of this blog when all that anyone sees out there is roads to riches and the housing boom that will take the prices to infinity.

Thursday, May 3, 2007

April Numbers are out...

And they paint an interesting picture. Prices have gone up, but in what should be busiest month of the year, the sales have gone only modestly up in Edmonton and have actually gone down by 11% in Calgary relative to March 2007.
Sales down and prices up with higher inventory is usually the first sign of an approaching 'inflexion point'. If this trend continues for a few months, price rise nothwithstanding, we could see a top in the coming months.
Based on what I've personally heard from a few of my flipper friends and read about some would be buyers, not too many people are expecting any more magical increases. Even regualr Joe owner is talking about "who can afford this stuff anymore". This could be a classic contrarian signal as well. If too many people start expecting prices to fall or stabalize, it may not actually happen.
Long term Albertans have heard of, if not totally cognizant of the risks involved with Alberta real estate. Who can forget the nadir of last cycle when townhomes used to sell for $45000 (yeah the same ones that sell for close to $300k now). Or that there are absolutely no jobs when the commodity cycle turns the other way round. Such people could be flippers or long term holders of such properties, but they would not go on and buy for the fear of getting priced out. You need totally different breed of people for that to occur. Recent immigrants and those moving from other province comprise this group. They have only seen one side of Alberta and they don't even know that there's another side. That's why they are buying starter homes for $400k in the not so great locations in Edmonton and Calgary. Just like the kids fresh out of college making $70k during dot com boom thought that you don't have to work to make such a wage!

Should there be a 'risk premium' built into Alberta real estate to allow for these events? Just like there's a risk premiumbuilt into junk bonds- Great yields, but a higher potential for default. It's great to compare Edmonton and Calgary with Toronto and other big cities, but those other cities are usually not one trick ponies. In case one sector goes down, others keep on going.

Sorry for the not so frequent posting during last month. I've been going through a major repriortization of things in my life at this point and have been consumed with a number of other things. And to answer one of the comments, I don't have any plans of shutting down this blog.

Thursday, April 5, 2007

March Numbers and some fundamentals

New highs for both Edmonton and Calgary.
Starting with Edmonton numbers first.
Average price in Edmonton is now up to $325k, slightly up from February value of $321k. Average SFD in Edmonton is now close to $400k, up almost $25k from last month. Condos witnessed a slight decline. Inventory has almost doubled since last summer to 2574 (2120 for February).
Calgary SFD is now $463k. The overall average is now $415k.

What do I make of these numbers? The basic question is- who will afford housing at these prices? How many people can buy $400k starter homes?And $250k condo in Edmonton and $325k condo in Calgary?

Of course, Edmonton can become as expensive as Calgary. But can Calgary become as expensive as Vancouver? A lot of 'investors' could be counting on that.

At these prices, Calgary is more expensive than Toronto and Edmonton is almost approaching the Toronto prices. Also, for some perspective, both Houston and Dallas have average prices the same as the pre-boom Alberta prices. Below $200k.

From a fundamental perspective the question is: Why have prices almost doubled in the last two years in both Edmonton and Calgary? I realize there are the usual 'supply/demand' and other economic theory answers to explain the short term movement of prices, but there is more at play when people are buying something for the long terms (5 to 35 years horizon).
My questions are:

Is there a shortage of land that can be developed in both Edmonton and Calgary?
Have the prices of raw materials really doubled?
Has labour cost really doubled?



Other than these factors above, Edmonton and Calgary are not world class cities by any stretch of imagination. Except for during periods of oil boom, both cities have slow growth and poorly diversified economies, very few jobs, limited city based attractions, poor international connectivity (air travel etc) and generally very little to do. I don't want to start a debate on the Battle of Alberta, but Calgary has more to do(mountains) than Edmonton(yes, there's a mall here) and that's probably the reason for its traditionally higher prices. The reputation of Edmonton as Deadmonton is well earned.
I'm highlighting these factors because most of the people are not thinking about any of these things when they are taking a 35 year mortgage to buy a $300k bungalow on Alberta Avenue in Edmonton.
And if for some reason, an unexpected drop in oil prices occurs, or if there is an unfavorable oil sands regulation due to environmental concerns, what will support these prices? West Edmonton mall alone is not good enough to keep people in Edmonton. Yes, there is lure of mountains in Calgary, but it may not be enough.

And to all those practice, my best wishes for the Easter long weekend. All others have a nice holiday.
 
Real Estate Blogs - Blog Top Sites