Weekend Open Thread

• Short term rates in the US are negative again. There's certainly the fear of inflation that is about to be unleashed imminently, but for now, TBTB know that there's nothing to be afraid of by getting fully into short term UST.
• Here's an interesting perspective on the reflation trade- what if the commodity boom fueled since early spring is not based on solid sustainable demand? The answers won't be pretty for many, but particularly ugly for Canada and Australia.
• If CMHC keeps on expanding its balance sheet, will the bubble ever burst in Canadian real estate? Remember, the music went on in the US until mortgage reset based defaults started to hit the collateral quality in a direct way. Assuming the interest rates stay low for at least the short to medium term, what will cause the bubble to be popped in face of all the free money that is being thrown?
• Debt is the real enemy. It takes quite a lot of debt to produce any income stream. Be it professional education (medicine, dentistry, law school), small businesses (think of franchises and mom/pop shops) or a vanilla real estate(strip malls, apartment buildings, commercial condos). A friend of mine who was laid off from an oil and gas company late last year has been unsuccessful at finding any work in his engineering profession. He's looking at buying a small fast food type of business. For a small food business(think Subway Sandwich restaurant) that produces barely $100k of free cash per year, the prices are close to $500k. Why? Because there is plenty of debt available. Think of Canadian government's pledge to help small businesses via number of its programs and the BDC. These loans all inflate the prices of underlying assets, just as CMHC based loans make real estate more expensive. Same with student loans. Cost of education keeps on climbing because the government wants to make education affordable. In the process, they are making education more expensive by throwing more debt at everyone. 'Affordable' in the government parlance means- we'll lend you money so that you can afford something done by being debt slaves for the rest of your lives. Not unlike the targets of CMHC. In the US, this has reached a breaking point now with the recent riots in the Universities of California system. The government's solution is simple- keep on increasing prices for homes, education, small businesses and keep on providing more debt. All the government entities do the same task. Instead of making things 'affordable', they make all these things accessible to joe public. At enormous price. And in a nation full of financial illiterates and 'per month payment' champions, accessibility means affordability.

Have a good weekend everyone.

Weekend Open Thread

• Officially double digit unemployment in the USA. Too bad, the unofficial or the other official metrics of unemployment are much higher.
• Canada is not doing so badly at a mere 8.6%. But what's this, someone is actually questioning the discrepancy between what StatsCan reports based on household surveys and the official payroll reports. There's a huge gap between the two. The unemployment numbers based on household survey are very volatile for Canada showing huge gains and losses in a short period. Potentially, the higher the layoffs in a month, the more the vigor with which the ex-employees will claim that they are self employed. I'd say that the payroll report is more objective, unless we want to believe that employers are firing employees and then hiring them again pretty soon as consultants.
• But I guess none of this should really make any difference to the overall economy. After all, an economy built on speculation in stocks and commodities and selling homes to each other does not require such puritan thoughts as solid employment, savings, fiscal and monetary restraint. I guess everyone will now have more time to attend open houses, visit show homes and become day traders . {Sarcasm}
• Have a good weekend everyone.

Growing economy, more jobs and other lies

Why is it that every contraction in GDP called 'unexpected'? Or every decline in jobs seen through the eyes of economist who never saw it coming?Why do all these economics have to constantly bullish projections? I think I know the answer-they are the cheerleaders for their respective sell side institutions, including the central banks. Here's the headline from Globe and Mail:

Economy contracted slightly in August as gross domestic product fell 0.1 per cent, following flat reading in July, but economists still believe recession over.

Why should anyone listen to these moronic 'economists' when they didn't even see it coming. Some time in future they will all claim that they never saw the housing bust coming.

Two very sobering releases from Stats Can- the Payroll report and the GDP report.

The GDP number takes us back all the way to the fall of 2005 with a total output of around $1170 billion or so. So much for 4 years of growth and the new era of prosperity brought in by the dirty oil and natural gas speculators. The growth is occurring in the same sectors-construction and public sector. One paid by tax payers now and for the other the bill will be coming pretty soon in the form of tax payer supported bailouts.

Too bad, Canada didn't spend anything on stimulus plan. Oops...they did spend around $50 billion, but that wasn't enough to still get us out of recession. Next on agenda-more spending backed by the strength of the Canadian tax payers.

The payroll report is even more sobering -guess why nobody in mainstream media talked about it. More than 110,000 non farm payroll jobs lost in August. If you look at the payroll graphs you'll see that the employment numbers are back to 2007 levels only. But the GDP is back to 2005 levels. So the economy will most likely shed more jobs to produce the same extent of output and maintain similar level of productivity. Or may be most of the employment was generated by the public sector requiring no productivity.

This is all happening when the commodities have not been routed at all-they have merely come down a bit from their all time high prices. What will Canada and Alberta be like, when the commodities do enter their secular bear market? Is there a plan B here, other than continually expanding the balance sheet of CMHC?

Have a good weekend everyone.

And the secret recipe for continued housing strength is...

CMHC. Or secruitization and mortgages backed by us, the poor Canadian tax payers. CMHC has been given the go ahead to increase its mortgage cap limit to $600 billion by the Federal government. The government has full commitment to just one thing-ensuring that assets bubble don't deflate, no matter what the cost. For stupid $2 to $5 million items and expense items much smaller than that, there's a lot of debate, discussion, media attention and bickering. Yet hundreds of billions are implicitly guaranteed without anyone asking a single question anywhere. Such is the power bankers yield in this day and age.

Just for perspective, this limit is roughly half of our GDP. And when things go south, as they most likely will, what would it do to the Canadian sovereign rating? And deficits? the Loonie? Most of the people would ignore this, as they generally do until it's too late. We are following the footsteps of US just too closely.

The question is-will be lucky and see the bubble pop when the guarantees are mere $600 billion or will we have to wait till we hit a sweet trillion dollars or more?

At least the illusions of the strength of the Canadian banking system and the robustness of our lending practices are intact.

More on Natural Gas

Our province's economy depends significantly on natural gas prices. More specifically, a strong Alberta economy depends on strong natural gas prices. In the past, many have speculated the ramifications for Alberta if the prices were to enter a sustained downturn.
The recent shale natural gas discoveries are getting noticeable coverage in the mainstream media and many are even speculating that this will solve the perennial US dependence on foreign energy resources.
What do you think?

Deja Vu all over again

It's getting harder and harder to be a bear. It is as if the laws of common sense have all been rewritten. Less is more, debt is good, you buy houses when you don't have a job and prices rise in recession. The real demand is down, price cuts are rampant and yet inflationary fears are exacerbated by attempts to ward off almost certain deflation. It's harder to actually think rationally about finance, economics and market any more. Natural gas prices go up and down by more than 25 per cent in a single session. US Dollar keeps on falling on account of increasing deficits and loose monetary policy, yet most of the currencies it's declining against (CAD, Euro, INR, JPY etc) are just as fiscally profligate. Decoupling which had barely been buried solidly six feet in the ground just a few months ago is back with a vengeance.
We are closer to an 'economic black hole' perhaps, now that none of the 'old laws' of economics have stopped working any more.
Real estate wars are heating up all over the world. From Delhi to San Diego, it seems a solid resurgence in real estate has taken place. It seems the world is buccaneering again on the dosage of easy availability of money. No lessons from past mistakes have been learned nor any punishments served on those who brought about the pain to the masses. And here we are ready to repeat the show.
Real demand for finished products is down worldwide, yet China is building more capacity to export. China is stockpiling more of commodities, boosting Australia's economy. And this brings back decoupling back into vogue.
Multiple bids were common in 2005, 2005 and 2007. And they are back in the summer and fall of 2009.
What's the end game from this? The central bankers and pretty much all governments have only one faith and ambition- to somehow in someway refuel one global bubble. So far they are having some success.
What do you all think?

Alberta sans Natural Gas

Those who have spent any time in Alberta know that the province might get all the hype for its conventional oil and oil sands assets, but it is really a natural gas driven province. What would happen if Alberta's natural gas was simply 'priced out' of the market? What would happen to the provincial royalties and the provincial budget that has gotten used to the cushy $7 to $8 prices?
This article in the Globe discusses just that:

Combine that with a technological revolution that has allowed firms to profitably extract shale gas at $4 to $5 per thousand cubic feet, compared with $7 or $8 for new Canadian conventional supplies, and Alberta gas may find itself simply priced out of the market.

...“Canadian plays in general have some challenges because of the higher cost structure and greater distance to market,” EnCana chief executive officer Randy Eresman said this month.

Could Encana's forthcoming splitting might have anything to do with this changed game?

In the article there are a few other critical insights:

“There may well be a ceiling on North American gas prices,” Gary Leach said. “We may be range-bound – at the top end, around $6, $6.50 – and a lot of Alberta natural gas needs prices higher than that.”

“Either they bring down the costs and there will be a larger industry, or the costs remain the same and it will be a much smaller industry,” he said.

But wage deflation in the oil and gas sector is simply impossible? After all, don't Albertans have to pay well over $300k just to get a little shoe box in the middle of prairies?
Too bad, those signing up for 35 year mortgages based on the very recent prosperity of the province might wake up to numerous economic surprises during the different stages of their mortgaged lives.